English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Logarithmic temperature profiles in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons173445

Ahlers,  G.
Laboratory for Fluid Dynamics, Pattern Formation and Biocomplexity, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons173472

Bodenschatz,  E.
Laboratory for Fluid Dynamics, Pattern Formation and Biocomplexity, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons173537

He,  X.
Laboratory for Fluid Dynamics, Pattern Formation and Biocomplexity, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ahlers, G., Bodenschatz, E., Funfschilling, D., Grossmann, S., He, X., Lohse, D., et al. (2012). Logarithmic temperature profiles in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection. Physical Review Letters, 109(11): 114501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.114501.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002A-291E-4
Abstract
We report results for the temperature profiles of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection (RBC) in the interior of a cylindrical sample of aspect ratio Γ≡D/L=0.50 (D and L are the diameter and height, respectively). Both in the classical and in the ultimate state of RBC we find that the temperature varies as A×ln(z/L)+B, where z is the distance from the bottom or top plate. In the classical state, the coefficient A decreases in the radial direction as the distance from the side wall increases. For the ultimate state, the radial dependence of A has not yet been determined. These findings are based on experimental measurements over the Rayleigh-number range 4×1012≲Ra≲1015 for a Prandtl number Pr≃0.8 and on direct numerical simulation at Ra=2×1012, 2×1011, and 2×1010, all for Pr=0.7.