English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Talk

Changing for the better? Effects of meditation based trainings on different sub-components of prosociality

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons71667

Böckler,  Anne
Department Social Neuroscience, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20056

Tusche,  Anita
Department Social Neuroscience, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20000

Singer,  Tania
Department Social Neuroscience, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2015). Changing for the better? Effects of meditation based trainings on different sub-components of prosociality. Talk presented at Joint Action Meeting (JAM). Budapest, Hungary. 2015-07-01 - 2015-07-04.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-2FC1-4
Abstract
Prosocial behavior – from offering seats to the elderly to taking in refugees - is a form of social interaction that is crucial for functioning societies. The present studies aimed at investigating i) the structure and ii) the plasticity of different facets of prosocial behavior. In order address the first goal, fourteen measurements of prosocial behavior from different research traditions were integrated, ranging from self-reports to game theoretical paradigms. Using factor analyses in two independent samples, we identified and confirmed four meaningful and reliable sub-components of prosociality: altruistically motivated-, norm motivated-, strategically motivated-, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Subsequently, we investigated how the identified sub-components changed as a function of three specific, twelve-week mental training techniques, focusing either on attention and awareness (Presence), loving kindness and caring motivation (Affect), or metacognitive and perspective taking (Perspective). Results revealed that truly altruistic behavior was most efficiently enhanced by the affect-based training, while norm-driven behavior was reduced particularly by the perspective taking training. Interestingly, (changes in) self-reported and behavior-based prosociality were not correlated, suggesting that people who consider themselves (increasingly) altruistic don’t necessarily behave in that manner. Taken together, our results suggest that different facets of prosocial preferences can be identified and differentially altered by specific mental trainings.