User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

The development of inversion in wh-questions: a reply to Van Valin

There are no MPG-Authors available
External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

Rowland & Pine_2003.pdf
(Publisher version), 115KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Rowland, C. F., & Pine, J. M. (2003). The development of inversion in wh-questions: a reply to Van Valin. Journal of Child Language, 30(1), 197-212. doi:10.1017/S0305000902005445.

Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-54BE-0
Van Valin (Journal of Child Language29, 2002, 161–75) presents a critique of Rowland & Pine (Journal of Child Language27, 2000, 157–81) and argues that the wh-question data from Adam (in Brown, A first language, Cambridge, MA, 1973) cannot be explained in terms of input frequencies as we suggest. Instead, he suggests that the data can be more successfully accounted for in terms of Role and Reference Grammar. In this note we re-examine the pattern of inversion and uninversion in Adam's wh-questions and argue that the RRG explanation cannot account for some of the developmental facts it was designed to explain.