English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Reliability and statistical power analysis of cortical and subcortical FreeSurfer metrics in a large sample of healthy elderly

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors available
Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Liem, F., Merillat, S., Bezzola, L., Hirsiger, S., Philipp, M., Madhyastha, T., et al. (2015). Reliability and statistical power analysis of cortical and subcortical FreeSurfer metrics in a large sample of healthy elderly. NeuroImage, 108, 95-109. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.035.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-780D-7
Abstract
FreeSurfer is a tool to quantify cortical and subcortical brain anatomy automatically and noninvasively. Previous studies have reported reliability and statistical power analyses in relatively small samples or only selected one aspect of brain anatomy. Here, we investigated reliability and statistical power of cortical thickness, surface area, volume, and the volume of subcortical structures in a large sample (N = 189) of healthy elderly subjects (64 + years). Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) of cortical and subcortical parameters is generally high (cortical: ICCs > 0.87, subcortical: ICCs > 0.95). Surface-based smoothing increases reliability of cortical thickness maps, while it decreases reliability of cortical surface area and volume. Nevertheless, statistical power of all measures benefits from smoothing. When aiming to detect a 10% difference between groups, the number of subjects required to test effects with sufficient power over the entire cortex varies between cortical measures (cortical thickness: N = 39, surface area: N = 21, volume: N = 81; 10 mm smoothing, power = 0.8, α = 0.05). For subcortical regions this number is between 16 and 76 subjects, depending on the region. We also demonstrate the advantage of within-subject designs over between-subject designs. Furthermore, we publicly provide a tool that allows researchers to perform a priori power analysis and sensitivity analysis to help evaluate previously published studies and to design future studies with sufficient statistical power.