Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Buch

Invisibility and Labour in The Human Sciences

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons193888

Bangham,  Jenny
Department Ideals and Practices of Rationality, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons194119

Kaplan,  Judith
Department Ideals and Practices of Rationality, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

P484.pdf
(Preprint), 9MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Bangham, J., & Kaplan, J. (Eds.). (2016). Invisibility and Labour in The Human Sciences. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-78AC-3
Zusammenfassung
There are powerful social, political, and epistemological reasons for concealing (or revealing) certain people and practices in the course of scientific research and publication. The human sciences—including biology and biomedicine as well as anthropology, linguistics, and social science—depend upon people with diverse values and expertise, who have varied motivations and degrees of political agency. Research encounters are often orchestrated by actors behind the scenes—tissue donors, survey respondents, student subjects, translators, activists, ethics review boards, civic or religious institutions, lawyers, nurses, and archivists. Their contributions move in and out of the shadows as scientific knowledge is made, with important consequences for the authority and authenticity of research findings. Through a collection of case studies, this volume encourages methodological reflection on whether and how historians of science and STS scholars might recover contributions to the human sciences. Ultimately the volume asks how our professional, institutional, geographical and political circumstances condition whom we claim to speak of and for.