English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Lipopolysaccharide-cell interaction and induced cellular activation in whole blood of septic patients

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons191059

Freudenberg,  Marina
Department of Developmental Immunology, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Salomao, R., Brunialti, M. K. C., Kallás, E. G., Martins, P. S., Rigato, O., & Freudenberg, M. (2002). Lipopolysaccharide-cell interaction and induced cellular activation in whole blood of septic patients. Journal of Endotoxin Research, 8(5), 371-379.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-967F-A
Abstract
We used biotinylated LPS (LPSb) and flow cytometry to study LPS-monocyte interaction and LPS-induced cellular activation in whole blood from septic patients (SP). Expression of surface activation markers was evaluated on monocytes (HLA-DR) and T lymphocytes (CD69 and CD95), and intracellular TNF-α on monocytes. Saturating curve and kinetics of LPSb detection on monocytes were similar in SP and healthy volunteers (HV). LPSb bound to monocytes was detected after 5 min of incubation in both groups, with a more pronounced decay in SP. Monocytes from SP had a lower expression of HLA-DR as compared to HV, both constitutive and upon LPS stimulation. The proportion of monocytes producing TNF-α after LPS stimulus was higher in HV than SP (mean ± SD=25.2 ± 14.2% and 2.2 ± 2.6%, respectively, P < 0.001). LPS-induced CD69 on T CD8 and CD8 lymphocytes was similar for patients and controls. Expression of CD95 on T lymphocytes was higher in SP as compared to HV on T CD8 cells (GMFI, mean, ± SD = 22.3 ± 14.6 and 8.6 ± 5.0, respectively, P = 0.01) and CD8 cells (GMFI, mean ± SD = 28.3 ± 7.7 and 14 ± 4.3 respectively, P<0.001). Thus, monocytes and lymphocytes seem to respond differently to LPS in septic patients. Monocyte hyporesponsiveness appears not to be related to a decreased binding capacity of LPS, but rather to an impaired signal transduction.