Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pKa corrections


König,  Gerhard
Research Department Thiel, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)

(Supplementary material), 713KB


Pickard, F. C., König, G., Tofoleanu, F., Lee, J., Simmonett, A. C., Shao, J., et al. (2016). Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pKa corrections. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 1087-1100. doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9955-7.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-A42B-6
The computation of distribution coefficients between polar and apolar phases requires both an accurate characterization of transfer free energies between phases and proper accounting of ionization and protomerization. We present a protocol for accurately predicting partition coefficients between two immiscible phases, and then apply it to 53 drug-like molecules in the SAMPL5 blind prediction challenge. Our results combine implicit solvent QM calculations with classical MD simulations using the non-Boltzmann Bennett free energy estimator. The OLYP/DZP/SMD method yields predictions that have a small deviation from experiment (RMSD = 2.3 log D units), relative to other participants in the challenge. Our free energy corrections based on QM protomer and pKa calculations increase the correlation between predicted and experimental distribution coefficients, for all methods used. Unfortunately, these corrections are overly hydrophilic, and fail to account for additional effects such as aggregation, water dragging and the presence of polar impurities in the apolar phase. We show that, although expensive, QM-NBB free energy calculations offer an accurate and robust method that is superior to standard MM and QM techniques alone.