Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Beitrag in Sammelwerk

Asia: An indigenous cosmovisionary turn in the study of religion and ecology

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons45863

Smyer Yu,  Dan
Religious Diversity, MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Max Planck Society;

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Smyer Yu, D. (2017). Asia: An indigenous cosmovisionary turn in the study of religion and ecology. In W. J. Jenkins, M. E. Tucker, & J. Grim (Eds.), Routledge handbook of religion and ecology (pp. 120-128). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315764788.ch13.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002C-AA5E-0
Zusammenfassung
Asia is the home of two-thirds of the world’s indigenous peoples. The total estimated indigenous populations of Asia are said to be around 260 million (IWGIA), mostly found in Siberia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Southwest China. Unlike their counterparts in the premodern era who relatively had more autonomy, the contemporary indigenous peoples of Asia are facing multiple distresses regarding the loss of their ancestral lands, the deprivation of their rights for self-determination, and the external exploitation of their natural resources. Modern nation-states often socially and economically marginalize indigenous populations. For instance, Karen in Burma are rarely given land and citizenry rights (Horstmann 2015, 130). China has fifty-five officially recognized ethnic minority groups. All of them except Hui (Muslims) are indigenous populations; however, the Chinese state does not officially recognize their indigenous status. Like the Chinese state, the Bangladesh government does not recognize its ethnic minorities as indigenous peoples but gives them marginal status as “tribes” and “minor races” (Dhamai and Chakma 2015, 314).