Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Modeling fear-conditioned bradycardia in humans

There are no MPG-Authors available
External Resource

(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (public)

(Publisher version), 426KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Castegnetti, G., Tzovara, A., Staib, M., Paulus, P. C., Hofer, N., & Bach, D. R. (2016). Modeling fear-conditioned bradycardia in humans. Psychophysiology, 53(6), 930-939. doi:10.1111/psyp.12637.

Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-2BEF-6
Across species, cued fear conditioning is a common experimental paradigm to investigate aversive Pavlovian learning. While fear-conditioned stimuli (CS+) elicit overt behavior in many mammals, this is not the case in humans. Typically, autonomic nervous system activity is used to quantify fear memory in humans, measured by skin conductance responses (SCR). Here, we investigate whether heart period responses (HPR) evoked by the CS, often observed in humans and small mammals, are suitable to complement SCR as an index of fear memory in humans. We analyze four datasets involving delay and trace conditioning, in which heart beats are identified via electrocardiogram or pulse oximetry, to show that fear-conditioned heart rate deceleration (bradycardia) is elicited and robustly distinguishes CS+ from CS−. We then develop a psychophysiological model (PsPM) of fear-conditioned HPR. This PsPM is inverted to yield estimates of autonomic input into the heart. We show that the sensitivity to distinguish CS+ and CS− (predictive validity) is higher for model-based estimates than peak-scoring analysis, and compare this with SCR. Our work provides a novel tool to investigate fear memory in humans that allows direct comparison between species.