Opinion of AG Kokott in the case Schenker: ignorance as a new defense in 
competition law proceedings?

Botta, Marco; Harsdorf, Natalie

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Case Note

Opinion of AG Kokott in the case Schenker: ignorance as a new defense in competition law proceedings?

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Botta, M., & Harsdorf, N. (2013). Opinion of AG Kokott in the case Schenker: ignorance as a new defense in competition law proceedings? Österreichische Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht, (2), 73-78.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002D-4DE0-3

Abstract

On 28th February 2013, Advocate General (AG) Kokott delivered her Opinion in the Case Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde (hereinafter Austrian National Competition Authority; Austrian NCA) v. Schenker. The case originates from a request for a preliminary ruling submitted in 2011 by the Austrian High Cartel Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).