The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple 
mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction

Tanner, Darren; Nicol, Janet; Brehm, Laurel

doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.07.003

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

Tanner_etal_2014.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Tanner, D., Nicol, J., & Brehm, L. (2014). The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 195-215. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.07.003.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-EABE-2

Abstract

Attraction interference in language comprehension and production may be as a result of common or different processes. In the present paper, we investigate attraction interference during language comprehension, focusing on the contexts in which interference arises and the time-course of these effects. Using evidence from event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and sentence judgment times, we show that agreement attraction in comprehension is best explained as morphosyntactic interference during memory retrieval. This stands in contrast to attraction as a message-level process involving the representation of the subject NP's number features, which is a strong contributor to attraction in production. We thus argue that the cognitive antecedents of agreement attraction in comprehension are non-identical with those of attraction in production, and moreover, that attraction in comprehension is primarily a consequence of similarity-based interference in cue-based memory retrieval processes. We suggest that mechanisms responsible for attraction during language comprehension are a subset of those involved in language production.