English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Photosynthesis-controlled calcification in a hypersaline microbial mat

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons210586

Ludwig,  R.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons210223

Al-Horani,  F. A.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons210257

de Beer,  D.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons210486

Jonkers,  H. M.
Permanent Research Group Microsensor, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

deBeer5.pdf
(Publisher version), 599KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ludwig, R., Al-Horani, F. A., de Beer, D., & Jonkers, H. M. (2005). Photosynthesis-controlled calcification in a hypersaline microbial mat. Limnology and Oceanography, 50(6), 1836-1843.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-CFF1-6
Abstract
We investigated the hypothesis that sulfate reduction rather than oxygenic photosynthesis promotes calcification in a hypersaline microbial mat by increasing the ion concentration product: ICP 5 [Ca2+] X [CO32-]. Pore‐water 3 calcium concentration profiles directly measured with microsensors show that calcium concentration in the photic zone decreased in illuminated mats and increased slightly in dark mats. High pH values in the photic zone of illuminated mats resulted in higher carbonate concentrations (2.25 mmol L-1) than in dark mats (0.75 mmol L-1), although the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) pore‐water concentration in the former was much lower (5.9 mmol L-1) than in the latter (9.9 mmol L-1). The pH‐induced rise in carbonate concentration in the light was the main factor influencing the ICP, while changes in Ca-1 concentration played a subsidiary role. Sulfate reduction did not result in a net pH increase in these mats, as rates in the photic zone were comparable between illuminated and dark mats (4 and 5 nmol cm-2 h-1, respectively), and pH increased in illuminated mats but not in dark mats. Calcium carbonate precipitation in the photic zone of these hypersaline mats is primarily controlled by photosynthesisinduced pH and carbonate concentration increases. However, heterotrophic bacteria, including sulfate reducers, play an important complementary role in calcification because they maintain high concentrations of DIC in the mat pore water.