English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Patents and Cumulative Innovation – Evidence from Post-Grant Patent Oppositions

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons130180

Gaessler,  Fabian
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons130171

Harhoff,  Dietmar
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Gaessler, F., Harhoff, D., & Sorg, S. (2017). Patents and Cumulative Innovation – Evidence from Post-Grant Patent Oppositions. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1). doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2017.302.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-2CFF-9
Abstract
Using large-scale data on opposition to patents at the European Patent Office (EPO), we investigate the causal effect of a patent’s invalidation on follow-on inventions. We introduce a new instrumental variable exploiting the participation or absence of the patent examiner in the opposition proceeding. According to our baseline model, patent invalidation leads to a highly significant and sizable increase of forward citations. While this is in line with previous studies, disentangling the effect leads us to results that stand in stark contrast to some of the literature. We find that the effects are most pronounced for patents in discrete technology areas, for areas where patent thickets are absent and for patents which are not protected by ""patent fences"". Moreover, the effect is particularly strong for relatively small patent holders facing comparatively small follow-on innovators.