English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

A Comparison of Prospective Motion Correction with 19F NMR Field Probes and an Optical Camera

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons133452

Eschelbach,  M
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons192852

Aghaeifar,  A
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons192600

Bause,  J
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84257

Thielscher,  A
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons84187

Scheffler,  K
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource

Link
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Eschelbach, M., Aghaeifar, A., Bause, J., Handwerker, J., Anders, J., Thielscher, A., et al. (2017). A Comparison of Prospective Motion Correction with 19F NMR Field Probes and an Optical Camera. Poster presented at 25th Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM 2017), Honolulu, HI, USA.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0000-C4D3-4
Abstract
This work shows a comparison of prospective motion correction using NMR field probes and an optical tracking system in a phantom with induced motion as well as in an initial in vivo experiment. Tracking results for both systems were recorded concurrently to compare the motion estimates. The prospectively corrected images of a moving phantom and a moving human subject show a comparable correction ability for both systems. However, the lower precision of the field probe based system might prevent an application in highest-resolution imaging.