Effectiveness of the European Semester: Explaining Domestic Consent and 
Contestation

Maatsch, Aleksandra

doi:10.1093/pa/gsx021

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

Effectiveness of the European Semester: Explaining Domestic Consent and Contestation

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons185851

Maatsch, Aleksandra
Politische Ökonomie der europäischen Integration, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;
Department of Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany;

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx021
(出版社版)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

フルテキスト (公開)

PA_70_2017_Maatsch1.pdf
(全文テキスト（全般）), 312KB

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Maatsch, A. (2017). Effectiveness of the European Semester: Explaining Domestic Consent and Contestation. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(4), 691-709. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx021.

引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-20C1-0

要旨

Which factors explain domestic consent or contestation of European Union (EU) policy guidance issued within the framework of the European Semester (ES)? To address this question, this article analyses national parliamentary party positions on EU policy guidance in two cycles of the ES (2014 and 2015) in Austria, France, Germany and Ireland. Whereas parliamentary parties in Austria and Ireland expressed their consent to EU policy guidance, parliamentary parties in Germany and France were polarised. The empirical analysis presented in this article establishes that strong formal powers in budgetary matters are a prerequisite for parties to contest EU policy guidance. However, parliamentary party positions depend most on whether the content of EU policy guidance reflects a party’s economic interests.