English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Does Action Recognition Depend more on the Meaning or Motion of Different Actions?

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons83854

Chang,  D-S
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons83877

de la Rosa,  S
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Chang, D.-S., Bülthoff, H., & de la Rosa, S. (2014). Does Action Recognition Depend more on the Meaning or Motion of Different Actions?. Poster presented at 37th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 2014), Beograd, Serbia.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-326B-F
Abstract
How does the brain discriminate between different actions? Action recognition has been an active field of research for long time, still little is known about how the representations of different actions in the brain are related to each other. We wanted to find out whether different actions were ordered according to their semantic meaning or kinematic motion by employing a novel visual action adaptation paradigm. A total of 24 participants rated four different social actions in terms of their perceived differences in either semantic meaning or kinematic motion. Then, the specific perceptual bias for each action was determined by measuring the size of the action adaptation aftereffect in each participant. Finally, the meaning and motion ratings were used to predict the measured adaptation aftereffect for each action using linear regression. Semantic meaning and the interaction of meaning and motion significantly predicted the adaptation aftereffects, but kinematic motion alone was not a significant predictor. These results imply that differences between distinct actions are rather encoded in terms of their meaning than motion in the brain. The current experimental paradigm could be a useful method for further mapping the relationship between different actions in the human brain.