Do what (you think) the rich will do: Inequality and belief heterogeneity in 
public good provision

Martinangeli, Andrea F. M.

doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102364

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Zur Ablage hinzufügen

Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Do what (you think) the rich will do: Inequality and belief heterogeneity in public good provision

MPG-Autoren

/persons/resource/persons220670

Martinangeli, Andrea F. M.
Public Economics, MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3070528
(Preprint)

Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)

Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PuRe verfügbar

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Martinangeli, A. F. M. (2021). Do what (you think) the rich will do: Inequality and belief heterogeneity in public good provision. Journal of Economic Psychology, 83: 102364. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102364.

Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-437E-7

Zusammenfassung

Beliefs about others’ cooperativeness are among the strongest determinants of cooperative behaviours. Beliefs about different others, however, are not necessarily uniform, nor necessarily related to past behaviours: Different expectations about different others might solely originate from differences in observed individual characteristics. Finally, not all such beliefs need drive conditional behaviour alike.

In a public good game with heterogeneous endowments, I find that rich subjects are expected to cooperate more by both rich and poor individuals, and that behaviours of both the rich and poor correlate only with beliefs about the rich. An intervention aimed at increasing perceived group cohesion has no impact on beliefs and mixed impacts on cooperation. I conclude with implications for information dissemination about uncooperative behaviour in the mass media and avenues for further research.