Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Intercomparison Experiment, TROLIX ’91, Field Phase 
Report

Bösenberg, Jens; Ancellet, Gerard; Apituley, Arnoud; Bergwerff, Jens; von Cossart, Gözt; Edner, Hans; Fiedler, Jens; Galle, Bo; de Jonge, Cora; Mellqvist, Johan; Mitev, Valentin; Schaberl, Thorsten; Sonnemann, Gerd; Spakman, Jan; Swart, Daan; Wallinder, Eva

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Paper

Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Intercomparison Experiment, TROLIX ’91, Field Phase Report

MPS-Authors

Bösenberg, Jens
MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

Schaberl, Thorsten
MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

102-Report.pdf
(Publisher version), 16MB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Bösenberg, J., Ancellet, G., Apituley, A., Bergwerff, J., von Cossart, G., Edner, H., et al. (1993). Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Intercomparison Experiment, TROLIX ’91, Field Phase Report. Report / Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, 102.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-87E9-0

Abstract

The Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Intercomparison Experiment TROLIX ’91 has been initi- ated as part of the TESLAS subproject of the cooperative programme EUROTRAC. It has been performed in June 1991 at the Rijksinstitut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiene (RIVM) in Bilthoven, The Netherlands. The experiment was based on the simultaneous operation of different types of differential absorption lidars (DIAL), a special version of a Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Instrument (DOAS), helicopter borne in situ instruments, and many other supporting measurements. After a short introduction to the general methodology the instruments are described, the experimental operations are explained, and a selection of data are presented. Some examples are given for the results of the intercomparison, as far as they have been available at the present stage of evaluation. The main purpose of this report, however, is to provide an overview over the material collected during the experiment, in order to facilitate further detailed studies in cooperation between the different groups which have participated.