English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Climate variability in a coupled GCM. Part II: The Indian Ocean and monsoon

MPS-Authors

Latif,  Mojib
MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

Assenbaum,  Michael
MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

Junge,  Martina M.
MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

Maier-Reimer,  Ernst
MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

JoC-1994-Latif.pdf
(Publisher version), 970KB

104-Report.pdf
(Preprint), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Latif, M., Sterl, A., Assenbaum, M., Junge, M. M., & Maier-Reimer, E. (1994). Climate variability in a coupled GCM. Part II: The Indian Ocean and monsoon. Journal of Climate, 7, 1449-1462. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<1449:CVIACG>2.0.CO;2.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-8A3E-F
Abstract
We have investigated the seasonal cycle and the interannual variability of the tropical Indian Ocean circulation and the Indian summer monsoon simulated by a coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation model in a 26-year integration. Although the model exhibits significant climate drift, overall, the coupled GCM simulates realistically the seasonal changes in the tropical Indian Ocean and the onset and evolution of the Indian summer monsoon. The amplitudes of the seasonal changes, however, are underestimated.
The coupled GCM also simulates considerable interannual variability in the tropical Indian Ocean circulation, which is partly related to the El Nino/Southern Oscillation phenomenon and the associated changes in the Walker circulation. Changes in the surface wind stress appear to be crucial in forcing interannual variations in the Indian Ocean SST. As in the Pacific Ocean, the net surface heat flux acts as a negative feedback on the SST anomalies.
The interannual variability in monsoon rainfall, simulated by the coupled GCM, is only about half as strong as observed. The reason for this is that the simulated interannual variability in the Indian monsoon appears to be related to internal processes within the atmosphere only. In contrast, an investigation based on observations shows a clear lead-lag relationship between interannual variations in the monsoon rainfall and tropical Pacific SST anomalies. Furthermore, the atmospheric GCM also fails to reproduce this lead-lag relationship between monsoon rainfall and tropical Pacific SST when run in a stand-alone integration with observed SSTs prescribed during the period 1970-1988. These results indicate that important physical processes relating tropical Pacific SST to Indian monsoon rainfall are not adequately modeled in our atmospheric GCM. Monsoon rainfall predictions appear therefore premature.