English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Naris Occlusion Effects Turbinate Development

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Weiler, E., Seeger, J., & Coppola, D. (2012). Naris Occlusion Effects Turbinate Development. Poster presented at Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Association for Chemoreception Sciences: AChemS XXXIV, Huntington Beach, FL, USA.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-A62F-0
Abstract
Naris occlusion is the method of choice for investigating the effects of odor deprivation in mammals. However, unilateral closure of a naris causes marked changes in the airflow in both the occluded and open nasal cavity. While on the occluded side the airflow is dramatically reduced, the open side is forced to carry a larger than normal volume. Also, naris occlusion abrogates alternating cycles of breathing, forcing constant duty on the open side. We were interested if these changes in airflow effect development of nasal turbinates given that mechanical stress induces bone growth and turbinates express odorant receptors in regionally defined areas. We therefore investigated mice aged 18-25 days, that had been naris occluded or shame operated on the day of birth. Turbinate morphology was examined in coronal serial sections throughout the rostrocaudal extent of the nasal cavity. Results demonstrate that naris occlusion has signficant effects on the size, shape, and position of nasal turbinates, especially rostrally. The most anterior turbinate, endoturbinate-I, takes on a delicate “filigree” appearance on the occluded side relative to the open side: 24% decrease in area/perimeter (open 65.2, closed 52.6; control 59.5 sq μm/μm; p<0.005) despite same perimeter; 82% increase in length/width, (open 7.4; closed 13.5; control 7.9 μm/μm; p <0.001). That these effects are attributed to airflow is supported by the intermediate values of controls. We conclude that a stimulus from airflow: mechanical, thermal or chemical, causes changes in the ontogenesis of nasal turbinate structure which in turn might induce changes in expression of odorant receptors. Acknowledgements: This study was supported by National Science Foundation grant #0641433 to DC.