On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial 
electric stimulation

Opitz, A; Yeagle, E; Thielscher, A; Schroeder, C; Mehta, AD; Milham, MP

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.027

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811918306426
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Opitz, A., Yeagle, E., Thielscher, A., Schroeder, C., Mehta, A., & Milham, M. (2018). On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation. NeuroImage, 181, 560-567. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.027.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-B71C-2

Abstract

Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) is an increasingly popular method for non-invasive modulation of brain activity and a potential treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders. However, there are concerns about the reliability of its application because of variability in TES-induced intracranial electric fields across individuals. While realistic computational models offer can help to alleviate these concerns, their direct empirical validation is sparse, and their practical implications are not always clear. In this study, we combine direct intracranial measurements of electric fields generated by TES in surgical epilepsy patients with computational modeling. First, we directly validate the computational models and identify key parameters needed for accurate model predictions. Second, we derive practical guidelines for a reliable application of TES in terms of the precision of electrode placement needed to achieve a desired electric field distribution. Based on our results, we recommend electrode placement accuracy to be < 1 cm for a reliable application of TES across sessions.