English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Effect of uniaxial stress on the magnetic phases of CeAuSb2

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons214487

Park,  Joonbum
Physics of Quantum Materials, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons126742

Mackenzie,  Andrew P.
Andrew Mackenzie, Physics of Quantum Materials, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons126653

Hicks,  Clifford W.
Clifford Hicks, Physics of Quantum Materials, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Park, J., Sakai, H., Mackenzie, A. P., & Hicks, C. W. (2018). Effect of uniaxial stress on the magnetic phases of CeAuSb2. Physical Review B, 98(2): 024426, pp. 1-7. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.024426.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-E2BF-9
Abstract
We present results of measurements of resistivity of CeAuSb2 under the combination of c-axis magnetic field and in-plane uniaxial stress. In unstressed CeAuSb2 there are two magnetic phases. The low-field A phase is a single-component spin-density wave (SDW), with q = (eta, +/-eta, 1/2), and the high-field B phase consists of microscopically coexisting (eta, eta, 1/2) and (eta, -eta, 1/2) spin-density waves. Pressure along a < 100 > lattice direction is a transverse field to both of these phases and so initially has little effect, however it eventually induces new low-and high-field phases in which the principal axes of the SDW components appear to have rotated to the < 100 > directions. Under this strong < 100 > compression, the field evolution of the resistivity is much smoother than at zero strain: In zero strain, there is a strong first-order transition, while under strong < 100 > it becomes much broader. We hypothesize that this is a consequence of the uniaxial stress lifting the degeneracy between the (100) and (010) directions.