Deutsch
 
Benutzerhandbuch Datenschutzhinweis Impressum Kontakt
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

The production effect and the generation effect improve memory in picture naming

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons198504

Zormpa,  Eirini
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons209068

Brehm,  Laurel
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons180676

Hoedemaker,  Renske S.
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons1167

Meyer,  Antje S.
Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society;
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine Externen Ressourcen verfügbar
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

zormpa_etal_2018.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 2MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

pmem_a_1510966_sm9257.pdf
(Ergänzendes Material), 221KB

Zitation

Zormpa, E., Brehm, L., Hoedemaker, R. S., & Meyer, A. S. (2018). The production effect and the generation effect improve memory in picture naming. Memory. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1510966.


Zitierlink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-E79F-8
Zusammenfassung
The production e ff ect (better memory for words read aloud than words read silently) and the picture superiority e ff ect (better memory for pictures than words) both improve item memory in a picture naming task (Fawcett, J. M., Quinlan, C. K., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Interplay of the production and picture superiority e ff ects: A signal detection analysis. Memory (Hove, England ), 20(7), 655 – 666. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.693510). Because picture naming requires coming up with an appropriate label, the generation e ff ect (better memory for generated than read words) may contribute to the latter e ff ect. In two forced-choice memory experiments, we tested the role of generation in a picture naming task on later recognition memory. In Experiment 1, participants named pictures silently or aloud with the correct name or an unreadable label superimposed. We observed a generation e ff ect, a production e ff ect, and an interaction between the two. In Experiment 2, unreliable labels were included to ensure full picture processing in all conditions. In this experiment, we observed a production and a generation e ff ect but no interaction, implying the e ff ects are dissociable. This research demonstrates the separable roles of generation and production in picture naming and their impact on memory. As such, it informs the link between memory and language production and has implications for memory asymmetries between language production and comprehension.