Introducing the Detection of Auditory Error Responses Based on BCI Technology 
for Passive Interaction

Zander, TO; Klippel, DM; Scherer, R

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Conference Paper

Introducing the Detection of Auditory Error Responses Based on BCI Technology for Passive Interaction

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons84325

Zander, TO
Department Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

http://lamp.tugraz.at/~karl/verlagspdf/Proceeding_BCI_Conference_2011_neu.pdf
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Zander, T., Klippel, D., & Scherer, R. (2011). Introducing the Detection of Auditory Error Responses Based on BCI Technology for Passive Interaction. In G. Müller-Putz, R. Scherer, M. Billinger, A. Kreilinger, V. Kaiser, & C. Neuper (Eds.), 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference 2011 (pp. 252-255). Graz, Austria: Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-F2E1-F

Abstract

In this article we will introduce a passive BCI system for detecting responses of the human brain on the perception of errors in music. We played cadences, sequences of chords, to subjects who are experts in music theory and actively play an classical instrument. As the expectancy is highest at the ending chord, we randomly introduced cadences with erroneous ending. In consistence with previous studies from the neurosciences we evoked an event-related potential, mainly consisting of an early right anterior negativity re ecting syntatcic error processing followed by a stronger negativity in erroneous trials at 500 ms, induced by semantic processing. We could identify single trials of these processes with a standardized, crossvalidated offline classification scheme, resulting in an accuracy of 75.7 %.