The roles of secular states in the development of contemporary Chinese 
Buddhism: A cross-strait perspective on Buddhist Nunneries

Chiu, Tzu-Lung

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89369-3_8

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Contribution to Collected Edition

The roles of secular states in the development of contemporary Chinese Buddhism: A cross-strait perspective on Buddhist Nunneries

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons212769

Chiu, Tzu-Lung
Religious Diversity, MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-89369-3_8
(Publisher version)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Chiu, T.-L. (2019). The roles of secular states in the development of contemporary Chinese Buddhism: A cross-strait perspective on Buddhist Nunneries. In P. van der Veer, & K. Dean (Eds.), The secular in South, East, and Southeast Asia (pp. 165-189). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89369-3_8.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-103C-9

Abstract

When discussing Buddhism under People’s Republic of China (PRC) government supervision, some scholars implicitly or explicitly regard the development of Buddhism in China in a negative light, or are critical of the PRC government’s control of religions (e.g., Levering 1993; Chandler 2006; Qin 2000). Against this backdrop, this paper discusses, firstly, the religious life of present-day Chinese Buddhists through multiple case studies conducted at eight monastic institutions in China, with particular reference to whether and how monastics’ religious activities and everyday lives are subject to intervention or influence by past or current PRC government policies. Secondly, it discusses some of the nuanced differences between the religious lifestyles of Taiwanese and Chinese Buddhists: for, even though Taiwan and China both share similar contexts of Chinese Mahāyāna Buddhism, Buddhism in these two regions has different manifestations, in part because the Taiwanese state—though “secular” in the narrow sense of not promoting a particular state religion—has never attempted to ban public or private religious observance.