English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Making

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons225814

Lahoti,  Preethi
Databases and Information Systems, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons45720

Weikum,  Gerhard
Databases and Information Systems, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

arXiv:1806.01059.pdf
(Preprint), 653KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lahoti, P., Weikum, G., & Gummadi, K. P. (2018). iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Making. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01059.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-1545-9
Abstract
People are rated and ranked, towards algorithmic decision making in an increasing number of applications, typically based on machine learning. Research on how to incorporate fairness into such tasks has prevalently pursued the paradigm of group fairness: ensuring that each ethnic or social group receives its fair share in the outcome of classifiers and rankings. In contrast, the alternative paradigm of individual fairness has received relatively little attention. This paper introduces a method for probabilistically clustering user records into a low-rank representation that captures individual fairness yet also achieves high accuracy in classification and regression models. Our notion of individual fairness requires that users who are similar in all task-relevant attributes such as job qualification, and disregarding all potentially discriminating attributes such as gender, should have similar outcomes. Since the case for fairness is ubiquitous across many tasks, we aim to learn general representations that can be applied to arbitrary downstream use-cases. We demonstrate the versatility of our method by applying it to classification and learning-to-rank tasks on two real-world datasets. Our experiments show substantial improvements over the best prior work for this setting.