English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Immediate and delayed neuroendocrine responses to social exclusion in males and females

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons222491

Thaler,  H.
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society;
external;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

1-s2.0-S0306453017314464-main.pdf
(Publisher version), 887KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Radke, S., Seidel, E. M., Boubela, R. N., Thaler, H., Metzler, H., Kryspin-Exner, I., et al. (2018). Immediate and delayed neuroendocrine responses to social exclusion in males and females. PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 93, 56-64. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.005.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-5D6B-E
Abstract
Social exclusion is a complex phenomenon, with wide-ranging immediate and delayed effects on well-being, hormone levels, brain activation and motivational behavior. Building upon previous work, the current fMRI study investigated affective, endocrine and neural responses to social exclusion in a more naturalistic Cyberball task in 40 males and 40 females. As expected, social exclusion elicited well-documented affective and neural responses, i.e., increased anger and distress, as well as increased exclusion-related activation of the anterior insula, the posterior-medial frontal cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cortisol and testosterone decreased over the course of the experiment, whereas progesterone showed no changes. Hormone levels were not correlated with subjective affect, but they were related to exclusion-induced neural responses. Exclusion-related activation in frontal areas was associated with decreases in cortisol and increases in testosterone until recovery. Given that results were largely independent of sex, the current findings have important implications regarding between-sex vs. within-sex variations and the conceptualization of state vs. trait neuroendocrine functions in social neuroscience.