Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

The influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in Taylor-Couette turbulence


Lohse,  Detlef
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Verschoof, R. A., Bakhuis, D., Bullee, P. A., Huisman, S. G., Sun, C., & Lohse, D. (2018). The influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in Taylor-Couette turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 851, 436-446. doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.515.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-740F-C
We experimentally study the influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in turbulent Taylor-Couette flow, i.e. the flow between two concentric, independently rotating cylinders. We measure the drag in the system for the cases with and without air, and add roughness by installing transverse ribs on either one or both of the cylinders. For the smooth-wall case (no ribs) and the case of ribs on the inner cylinder only, we observe strong drag reduction up to DR= 33 % and DR= 23 %, respectively, for a void fraction of alpha =6 %. However, with ribs mounted on both cylinders or on the outer cylinder only, the drag reduction is weak, less than DR= 11 %, and thus quite close to the trivial effect of reduced effective density. Flow visualizations show that stable turbulent Taylor vortices - large-scale vortical structures - are induced in these two cases, i.e. the cases with ribs on the outer cylinder. These strong secondary flows move the bubbles away from the boundary layer, making the bubbles less effective than what had previously been observed for the smooth-wall case. Measurements with counter-rotating smooth cylinders, a regime in which pronounced Taylor rolls are also induced, confirm that it is really the Taylor vortices that weaken the bubble drag reduction mechanism. Our findings show that, although bubble drag reduction can indeed be effective for smooth walls, its effect can be spoiled by e.g. biofouling and omnipresent wall roughness, as the roughness can induce strong secondary flows.