English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Dual time-point [18F]florbetaben PET delivers dual biomarker information in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons19981

Schroeter,  Matthias L.
Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons20065

Villringer,  Arno
Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Germany;
Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Florek, L., Tiepolt, S., Schroeter, M. L., Berrouschot, J., Saur, D., Hesse, S., et al. (2018). Dual time-point [18F]florbetaben PET delivers dual biomarker information in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 66(3), 1105-1116. doi:10.3233/JAD-180522.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-9E01-B
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Current research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD include biomarkers to supplement clinical testing. Recently, we demonstrated that dual time-point [18F]FBB PET is able to deliver both blood flow and amyloid-β (Aβ) load surrogates.
OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to investigate whether these surrogates can be utilized as AD biomarkers.
METHODS:

112 subjects (41 with MCI, 50 with probable/possible AD, 21 with other dementias) underwent dual time-point [18F]FBB PET. Data were visually and relative quantitatively (Herholz scores for the early and composite SUVRs for the late PET data) analyzed.
RESULTS:

In the early images AD-typical patterns were present in 42% /27% /33% of probable/possible AD/MCI/other dementia cases. In late [18F]FBB PET, 42% /29% /38% of probable/possible AD/ MCI/other dementia cases were Aβ-positive. 17% of the MCIs were categorized as "MCI due to AD-high likelihood", 44% of the probable ADs as "probable AD with high evidence of AD pathophysiological process" and 28% of the possible ADs as "possible AD with evidence of AD pathophysiological process". 27% of all subjects showed a positive diagnostic and progression biomarker. Herholz scores were lower (0.85±0.05 versus 0.88±0.04, p = 0.015) for probable/possible AD versus MCI. Composite late phase SUVRs were significantly higher (1.65±0.23 versus 1.15±0.17, p < 0.005) in Aβ-positive versus Aβ-negative patients. Herholz and MMSE scores were positively correlated (R = 0.30 p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION:

Dual time-point [18F]FBB PET provides dual biomarker information which enables to categorize MCI and AD dementia patients according to established diagnostic criteria. Thus, dual time-point [18F]FBB PET has great potential to supplement diagnostic dementia workups.