User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse





SETH-Based Lower Bounds for Subset Sum and Bicriteria Path


Bringmann,  Karl
Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

(Preprint), 336KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Abboud, A., Bringmann, K., Hermelin, D., & Shabtay, D. (2018). SETH-Based Lower Bounds for Subset Sum and Bicriteria Path. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04546.

Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-9E17-3
Subset-Sum and k-SAT are two of the most extensively studied problems in computer science, and conjectures about their hardness are among the cornerstones of fine-grained complexity. One of the most intriguing open problems in this area is to base the hardness of one of these problems on the other. Our main result is a tight reduction from k-SAT to Subset-Sum on dense instances, proving that Bellman's 1962 pseudo-polynomial $O^{*}(T)$-time algorithm for Subset-Sum on $n$ numbers and target $T$ cannot be improved to time $T^{1-\varepsilon}\cdot 2^{o(n)}$ for any $\varepsilon>0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. This is one of the strongest known connections between any two of the core problems of fine-grained complexity. As a corollary, we prove a "Direct-OR" theorem for Subset-Sum under SETH, offering a new tool for proving conditional lower bounds: It is now possible to assume that deciding whether one out of $N$ given instances of Subset-Sum is a YES instance requires time $(N T)^{1-o(1)}$. As an application of this corollary, we prove a tight SETH-based lower bound for the classical Bicriteria s,t-Path problem, which is extensively studied in Operations Research. We separate its complexity from that of Subset-Sum: On graphs with $m$ edges and edge lengths bounded by $L$, we show that the $O(Lm)$ pseudo-polynomial time algorithm by Joksch from 1966 cannot be improved to $\tilde{O}(L+m)$, in contrast to a recent improvement for Subset Sum (Bringmann, SODA 2017).