English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Do Judges Hate Speculators?

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons196400

Hornuf,  Lars
MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hornuf, L., & Klöhn, L. (2019). Do Judges Hate Speculators? European Journal of Law and Economics, 47(2), 147-169. doi:10.1007/s10657-018-09608-z.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-BB10-9
Abstract
Historically, people have often expressed negative feelings toward speculators, a
sentiment that might have even been reinforced since the latest financial crisis, dur-
ing which taxpayer money was warranted or spent to bail out reckless investors. In
this paper, we conjecture that judges may also have anti-speculator sentiment, which
might affect their professional decision making. We asked 123 professional law-
yers and 247 law students in Germany this question, and they clearly predicted that
judges would have an anti-speculator bias. However, in an actual behavioral study,
185 judges did not exhibit such bias. In another sample of 170 professional lawyers,
we found weak support for an anti-speculator bias. This evidence suggests that an
independent audience may actually perceive unbiased judgments as biased. While
the literature usually suggests that a communication problem exists between lawyers
and non-lawyers (i.e. between judges and the general public), we find that this prob-
lem can also exist within the legal community.