English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Non-invasive brain stimulation to investigate language production in healthy speakers: A meta-analysis

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

Klaus_Schutter_2018.pdf
(Publisher version), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Klaus, J., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2018). Non-invasive brain stimulation to investigate language production in healthy speakers: A meta-analysis. Brain and Cognition, 123, 10-22. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2018.02.007.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-C2E6-F
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has become a common method to study the interrelations between the brain and language functioning. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the study of language production in healthy volunteers. Forty-five effect sizes from 30 studies which investigated the effects of NIBS on picture naming or verbal fluency in healthy participants were meta-analysed. Further sub-analyses investigated potential influences of stimulation type, control, target site, task, online vs. offline application, and current density of the target electrode. Random effects modelling showed a small, but reliable effect of NIBS on language production. Subsequent analyses indicated larger weighted mean effect sizes for TMS as compared to tDCS studies. No statistical differences for the other sub-analyses were observed. We conclude that NIBS is a useful method for neuroscientific studies on language production in healthy volunteers.