English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Poster

Effects of image statistics on stereo coding in human vision

MPS-Authors
There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

May, K., Zhaoping, L., & Hibbard, P. (2010). Effects of image statistics on stereo coding in human vision. Poster presented at 10th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society (VSS 2010), Naples, FL, USA.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-C724-5
Abstract
Biological visual systems continuously optimize themselves to the prevailing image statistics, which gives rise to the phenomenon of adaptation. For example, post-adaptation color appearance can be explained by efficient coding which appropriately combines the input cone channels into various chromatic and achromatic channels with suitable gains that depend on the input statistics [Atick, J.J., Li, Z. ∓ Redlich, A.N. (1993). Vision Research, 33, 123-129]. In this study we focus on the ocular channels corresponding to the two eyes. We investigated how image statistics influence the way human vision combines information from the two eyes. Efficient coding in ocular space [Li, Z. ∓ Atick, J.J. (1994) Network, 5, 157-174] predicts that the binocularity of neurons should depend on the interocular correlations in the visual environment: As the interocular correlations increase in magnitude, the neurons should become more binocular. In natural viewing conditions, interocular correlations are higher for horizontal than vertical image components, because vertical binocular disparities are generally smaller than horizontal disparities. Thus, adaptation to natural stereo image pairs should lead to a greater level of binocularity for horizontally-tuned neurons than vertically-tuned neurons, whereas adaptation to pairs of identical natural images should not. We used interocular transfer of the tilt illusion as an index of binocularity of neurons with different characteristics. Subjects adapted either to natural stereo pairs or pairs of identical natural images. As predicted, interocular transfer was higher for near-horizontal than near-vertical stimuli after adaptation to natural stereo pairs, but not after adaptation to pairs of identical natural images.