English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Response of the Circadian Clock and Diel Starch Turnover to One Day of Low Light or Low CO2

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons136683

Moraes,  T. A.
System Regulation, Department Stitt, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons136681

Mengin,  V.
System Regulation, Department Stitt, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons123025

Annunziata,  Maria Grazia
System Regulation, Department Stitt, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons124380

Encke,  Beatrice
System Regulation, Department Stitt, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons124378

Krohn,  Nicole
System Regulation, Department Stitt, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons97199

Höhne,  M.
System Regulation, Department Stitt, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons97427

Stitt,  M.
System Regulation, Department Stitt, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Max Planck Society;

Locator
There are no locators available
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts available
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Moraes, T. A., Mengin, V., Annunziata, M. G., Encke, B., Krohn, N., Höhne, M., et al. (2019). Response of the Circadian Clock and Diel Starch Turnover to One Day of Low Light or Low CO2. Plant Physiology, 179(4), 1457-1478. doi:10.1104/pp.18.01418.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-556A-7
Abstract
Diel starch turnover responds rapidly to changes in the light regime. We investigated if these responses require changes in the temporal dynamics of the circadian clock. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) was grown in a 12-h photoperiod for 19 d, shifted to three different reduced light levels or to low CO2 for one light period, and returned to growth conditions. The treatments produced widespread changes in clock transcript abundance. However, almost all of the changes were restricted to extreme treatments that led to carbon starvation and were small compared to the magnitude of the circadian oscillation. Changes included repression of EARLY FLOWERNG 4, slower decay of dusk components, and a slight phase delay at the next dawn, possibly due to abrogated Evening Complex function and sustained expression of PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORs and REVEILLEs during the night. Mobilization of starch in the night occurred in a linear manner and was paced to dawn, both in moderate treatments that did not alter clock transcripts and in extreme treatments that led to severe carbon starvation. We conclude that pacing of starch mobilization to dawn does not require retrograde carbon signaling to the transcriptional clock. On the following day, growth decreased, sugars rose, and starch accumulation was stimulated in low-light-treated plants compared to controls. This adaptive response was marked after moderate treatments and occurred independently of changes in the transcriptional clock. It is probably a time-delayed response to low-C signaling in the preceding 24-h cycle, possibly including changes in PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR and REVEILLE expression.