English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

Bottleneck Potentials in Markov Random Fields

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons238023

Abbas,  Ahmed
Computer Vision and Machine Learning, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons221924

Swoboda,  Paul
Computer Vision and Machine Learning, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

arXiv:1904.08080.pdf
(Preprint), 7MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Abbas, A., & Swoboda, P. (2019). Bottleneck Potentials in Markov Random Fields. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08080.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-9D88-3
Abstract
We consider general discrete Markov Random Fields(MRFs) with additional
bottleneck potentials which penalize the maximum (instead of the sum) over
local potential value taken by the MRF-assignment. Bottleneck potentials or
analogous constructions have been considered in (i) combinatorial optimization
(e.g. bottleneck shortest path problem, the minimum bottleneck spanning tree
problem, bottleneck function minimization in greedoids), (ii) inverse problems
with $L_{\infty}$-norm regularization, and (iii) valued constraint satisfaction
on the $(\min,\max)$-pre-semirings. Bottleneck potentials for general discrete
MRFs are a natural generalization of the above direction of modeling work to
Maximum-A-Posteriori (MAP) inference in MRFs. To this end, we propose MRFs
whose objective consists of two parts: terms that factorize according to (i)
$(\min,+)$, i.e. potentials as in plain MRFs, and (ii) $(\min,\max)$, i.e.
bottleneck potentials. To solve the ensuing inference problem, we propose
high-quality relaxations and efficient algorithms for solving them. We
empirically show efficacy of our approach on large scale seismic horizon
tracking problems.