Empirische Ästhetik der Sprache und Literatur: Was kann sie besser als die 
herkömmliche Literaturwissenschaft – und was nicht? [Gengo to bungaku no 
keikenbigaku: Kyūrai no bungaku kenkyū yori umaku syori dekirukoto, sosite 
dekinaikoto ha nanika?] (S. Ito, Trans.)

Menninghaus, Winfried

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Book Chapter

Empirische Ästhetik der Sprache und Literatur: Was kann sie besser als die herkömmliche Literaturwissenschaft – und was nicht? [Gengo to bungaku no keikenbigaku: Kyūrai no bungaku kenkyū yori umaku syori dekirukoto, sosite dekinaikoto ha nanika?] (S. Ito, Trans.)

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons130297

Menninghaus, Winfried
Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Menninghaus, W. (2019). Empirische Ästhetik der Sprache und Literatur: Was kann sie besser als die herkömmliche Literaturwissenschaft – und was nicht? [Gengo to bungaku no keikenbigaku: Kyūrai no bungaku kenkyū yori umaku syori dekirukoto, sosite dekinaikoto ha nanika?] (S. Ito, Trans.). In Y., Sakamoto, J., Tanaka, & Y., Takemine (Eds.), Image Studies Today: From Aby Warburg’s Mnemosyne Atlas to neurological Bildwissenschaft (pp. 433-454). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-F25D-4

Abstract

There is no abstract available