Unknown, Unloved? Public Opinion on and Knowledge of Suspended Sentences in the 
Netherlands

Van Gelder, Jean-Louis; Aarten, Pauline; Lamet, Willemijn; Van der Laan, Peter

doi:10.1177/0011128711426537

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Unknown, Unloved? Public Opinion on and Knowledge of Suspended Sentences in the Netherlands

MPS-Authors

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available

External Resource

https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128711426537
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Van Gelder, J.-L., Aarten, P., Lamet, W., & Van der Laan, P. (2015). Unknown, Unloved? Public Opinion on and Knowledge of Suspended Sentences in the Netherlands. Crime and Delinquency, 61(5), 669-689. doi:10.1177/0011128711426537.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-668B-D

Abstract

Public opinion research shows that the general public tends to perceive noncustodial sanctions, such as suspended sentences, as too lenient while being largely ignorant about their nature. In two studies among representative samples of the Dutch population, the authors examine public opinion about and knowledge of suspended sentences in the Netherlands. Findings suggest that knowledge of suspended sentences is positively related to their perceived punitiveness and beliefs in their effectiveness. Furthermore, opinions about suspended sentences are related to general penal attitudes. More punitive attitudes translate into less favorable opinions. Finally, providing information about suspended sentences can lead to more positive attitudes and greater belief in their effectiveness.