日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Accounting for Success: The Big Four as Allies of Finance in Post Crisis Regulatory Reform

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons238208

Kalaitzake,  Manolis
Politische Ökonomie von Wachstumsmodellen, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)

BP_21_2019_Kalaitzake.pdf
(全文テキスト(全般)), 367KB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Kalaitzake, M. (2019). Accounting for Success: The Big Four as Allies of Finance in Post Crisis Regulatory Reform. Business and Politics, 21(3), 297-326. doi:10.1017/bap.2019.6.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-4748-C
要旨
This paper argues that the Big Four accountancy firms—PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG—operate as key political allies of the financial sector within financial regulatory battles. Leveraging the theoretical notion of “actor plurality” within the policymaking process, I demonstrate how, in the case of the European Union Financial Transaction Tax (FTT) initiative, accountancy professionals offered crucial support for the financial sector. They did so by disseminating key oppositional claims against the FTT proposal, developing tax mitigation and relocation strategies, preparing negative impact assessments, and advising on lobbying tactics. This allied stance of the Big Four is primarily a consequence of the ways in which their commercial priorities have been fundamentally transformed by the provision of consultancy services within the modern global economy. Moreover, the paper shows how accountancy experts are deeply embedded within a network of professional relationships that fosters substantive policy alignment between the Big Four and prominent financial lobbying groups. By highlighting the overlooked role of the major accountancy firms within post crisis regulatory reform, the study illuminates the unequal power relations that permeate financialized societies and contributes to a deeper understanding of how financial preferences continue to prevail within the policymaking process.