日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons192802

Kumar,  VJ
Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
フルテキスト (公開)
公開されているフルテキストはありません
付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Wolfers, T., Floris, D., Dingha, R., van Rooij, D., Isakoglou, C., Kia, S., Zabihi, M., Llera, H., Chowdanayaka, R., Kumar, V., Peng, H., Laidi, C., Batalle, D., Dimitrova, R., Charman, T., Loth, E., Lai, M., Jones, E., Baumeister, S., Moessnang, C., Banaschewski, T., Ecker, C., Dumas, G., O'Muircheartaigh, J., Murphy, D., Buitelaar, J., Marquand, A., & Beckmann, C. (2019). From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, 240-254. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.010.


引用: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-6E00-1
要旨
Pattern classification and stratification approaches have increasingly been used in research on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) over the last ten years with the goal of translation towards clinical applicability. Here, we present an extensive scoping literature review on those two approaches. We screened a total of 635 studies, of which 57 pattern classification and 19 stratification studies were included. We observed large variance across pattern classification studies in terms of predictive performance from about 60% to 98% accuracy, which is among other factors likely linked to sampling bias, different validation procedures across studies, the heterogeneity of ASD and differences in data quality. Stratification studies were less prevalent with only two studies reporting replications and just a few showing external validation. While some identified strata based on cognition and intelligence reappear across studies, biology as a stratification marker is clearly underexplored. In summary, mapping biological differences at the level of the individual with ASD is a major challenge for the field now. Conceptualizing those mappings and individual trajectories that lead to the diagnosis of ASD, will become a major challenge in the near future.