English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

A cross-national study of the gender gap in health among older adults in India and China: similarities and disparities

MPS-Authors

Oksuzyan,  Anna
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Max Planck Society;

Singh,  Prashant Kumar
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Max Planck Society;

Jasilionis,  Domantas
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Oksuzyan, A., Singh, P. K., Christensen, K., & Jasilionis, D. (2018). A cross-national study of the gender gap in health among older adults in India and China: similarities and disparities. The Gerontologist, 58(6), 1156-1165.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-7C06-B
Abstract
<p>Background and Objectives: The present cross-sectional study examines gender differences in three major health measures among older adults in India and in China, and investigates whether these differences can be explained by major sociodemographic and health risk characteristics.</p> <p>Research Design and Methods: The study included 7,150 individuals in India and 13,367 individuals in China aged 50-plus who participated in the WHO Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health in 2007&ndash;2010. Logistic regression models for self-reported health (SRH) and ordinary least square regression models for grip strength and cognitive function were used to investigate gender differences in health.</p> <p>Results: A consistent female disadvantage was found in India and in China for all three health measures. Compared to their male counterparts, women in the Indian and the Chinese samples had, respectively, 38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22, 1.56) and 36% (95% CI: 1.25, 1.48) higher risk of reporting poor SRH, 9.56 kg (95% CI: 9.91, 9.22) and 11.95 kg (95% CI: 12.29, 11.62) lower grip strength, and 3.64 (95% CI: 3.96, 3.32) and 1.99 (95% CI: 2.28, 1.71) lower cognitive scores. The magnitude of the female disadvantage in poor SRH and in grip strength changed very little when adjustments were made for marital status, education, place of residence, smoking status, height, and number of chronic conditions; but these characteristics accounted for about 50% of the gender gap in cognitive function.</p> <p>Discussion and Implications: In these study populations, major sociodemographic and health risk characteristics accounted for very small parts of the gender differences in health, except in cognition.</p>