English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Balancing Donor‐Acceptor and Dispersion Effects in Heavy Main Group Element π Interactions: Effect of Substituents on the Pnictogen···π Arene Interaction

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons216817

Krasowska,  Małgorzata
Research Group Auer, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons125031

Auer,  Alexander A.
Research Group Auer, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Krasowska, M., Fritzsche, A.-M., Mehring, M., & Auer, A. A. (2019). Balancing Donor‐Acceptor and Dispersion Effects in Heavy Main Group Element π Interactions: Effect of Substituents on the Pnictogen···π Arene Interaction. ChemPhysChem, 20(19), 2539-2552. doi:10.1002/cphc.201900747.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-CE73-3
Abstract
High‐level ab initio calculations using the DLPNO‐CCSD(T) method in conjunction with the local energy decomposition (LED) were performed to investigate the nature of the intermolecular interaction in the bismuth trichloride adducts with π arene systems. Special emphasis was put on the effect of the substituent in the aromatic ring. For this purpose, benzene derivatives with one or three substituents (R = NO2, CF3, OCHO, OH and NH2) were chosen and their influence on donor‐acceptor interaction was examined. Local energy decomposition was performed in order to gain deeper insight into the composition of the interaction. Additionally, the study was extended to the intermolecular adducts of arsenic and antimony trichloride with benzene derivatives having one substituent (R = NO2 and NH2) in order to rationalize trends in the periodic table. The analysis of natural charges and frontier molecular orbitals shows that donor‐acceptor interactions are of π→σ* type and that their strength correlates with charge transfer and orbital energy differences. An analysis of different bonding motifs (Bi···π arene, Bi···R and Cl···π arene) shows that if dispersion and donor‐acceptor interaction coincide as the donor highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the arene is delocalized over the π system, the M···π arene motif is preferred. If the donor HOMO is localized on the substituent, R···π arene bonding motifs are preferred. The Cl···π arene bonding motif is the least favorable with the lowest overall interaction energy.