Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking

Haspelmath, Martin

doi:10.17617/2.3168042

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking

MPS-Authors

/persons/resource/persons72732

Haspelmath, Martin
Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society;

External Resource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (restricted access)

There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.

Fulltext (public)

shh2404.pdf
(Publisher version), 264KB

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Haspelmath, M. (2019). Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo, 62(1 (Issue in Honour of Frantisek Lichtenberk)), 93-115. doi:10.17617/2.3168042.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-CC97-C

Abstract

This paper compares the concept pair indexing/flagging with the well-known concept pair head/dependent marking that is widely used in typology. It shows that a general concept of flagging (comprising case and adpositional marking) is needed, and it sketches the advantages of the indexing concept over the older idea of “person agreement”. It then points out that the notions of head and dependent are hard to define (apart from the two basic domains of clauses and nominals), and that the head/dependent marking typology does not take the function of syntactic relation markers into account. On a functional view, both flags and indexes can be seen as role-identifiers, as opposed to concordants (attributive agreement markers). After discussing three further issues with the head/dependent marking typology, involving construct markers, concordants, and cross-indexes, I conclude that the concept pair indexing/flagging is more suitable for typological purposes than head/dependent marking.