English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Paper

The effect of habitat choice on evolutionary rescue in subdivided populations

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons211426

Czuppon,  Peter
Department Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons214490

Uecker,  Hildegard
Research Group Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics, Department Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society;

External Ressource

Link
(Any fulltext)

Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Czuppon, P., Blanquart, F., Uecker, H., & Débarre, F. (2019). The effect of habitat choice on evolutionary rescue in subdivided populations. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/738898.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-E46B-3
Abstract
Evolutionary rescue is the process by which a declining population successfully adapts genetically to avoid extinction. In a structured environment that deteriorates patch by patch, dispersal can substantially alter the chances of evolutionary rescue of a wild-type population not viable in deteriorated patches. Here, we investigate the effect of different dispersal schemes and intensities on the probability of successful establishment of a mutant population adapted to the deteriorated environment. We find that the probability of evolutionary rescue can undergo up to three phases when increasing the rate of dispersal: (i) at low dispersal rates, the probability of establishment of a mutant population increases; (ii) then at intermediate dispersal rates the establishment probability decreases; and (iii) at large dispersal rates, the population homogenizes, either promoting or suppressing the process of evolutionary rescue, depending on the fitness difference between the mutant and the wild type. Our results show that habitat choice, when compared to uniform dispersal, impedes successful adaptation when the mutant has the same habitat preference as the wild type, but promotes adaptation when the mutant mainly immigrates into patches where it has a growth advantage over the wild type.