English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Conventional and Bayesian approach to climate-change detection and attribution

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons37172

Hasselmann,  Klaus F.
MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Hasselmann, K. F. (1998). Conventional and Bayesian approach to climate-change detection and attribution. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 124, 2541-2565. doi:10.1002/qj.49712455202.


Cite as: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-755D-0
Abstract
The conventional multi-variate, multi-fingerprint theory of climate-change detection and attribution, expressed in terms of existing frequency distributions, is reviewed and generalized to a Bayesian approach based on subjective probabilities. Bayesian statistics enable a quantitative determination of the impact of climate-change detection tests on prior subjective assessments of the probability of an externally forced climate change. The Bayesian method also provides a potentially powerful tool for enhancing statistical detection and attribution tests by combining a number of different climate-change indicators that are not amenable to standard signal-to-noise analyses because of inadequate information on the associated natural-variability statistics. The relation between the conventional and Bayesian approach is illustrated by examples taken from recent conventional analyses of climate-change detection and attribution for three cases of climate-change forcing by increasing greenhouse-gas concentrations, increasing greenhouse-gas and aerosol concentrations, and variations, in solar insolation. The enhancement of detection and attribution levels through a joint Bayesian anal:lsis of a number of different climate-change indices is demonstrated in a further example. However, this advantage of the Bayesian approach can be achieved only within the framework of a subjective rather than objective analysis. The conventional and Bayesian approach both exhibit specific advantages and shortcomings, so that a parallel application of both methods is probably the most promising detection and attribution strategy.