Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse




Journal Article

Moving beyond curve fitting: Using complementary data to assess alternative explanations for long movements of three vulture species

There are no MPG-Authors in the publication available
External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available

Spiegel, O., Harel, R., Centeno-Cuadros, A., Hatzofe, O., Getz, W. M., & Nathan, R. (2015). Moving beyond curve fitting: Using complementary data to assess alternative explanations for long movements of three vulture species. American Naturalist, 185(2), E44-E54. doi:10.1086/679314.

Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-9ED9-5
Animal movements exhibit an almost universal pattern of fat-tailed step-size distributions, mixing short and very long steps. The Levy flight foraging hypothesis (LFFH) suggests a single optimal food search strategy to explain this pattern, yet mixed movement distributions are biologically more plausible and often convincingly fit movement data. To confront alternative explanations for these patterns, we tracked vultures of three species in two very different ecosystems using high-resolution global positioning system/accelerometer tags accompanied by behavioral, genetic, and morphological data. The Levy distribution fitted the data sets reasonably well, matching expectations based on their sparsely distributed food resources; yet the fit of mixed models was considerably better, suggesting distinct movement modes operating at three different scales. Specifically, long-range forays (LRFs)rare, short-term, large-scale circular journeys that greatly exceed the typical foraging range and contribute to the tail-fatness of the movement distribution in all three speciesdo not match an optimal foraging strategy suggested by the LFFH. We also found no support for preferred weather conditions or population genetic structure as alternative explanations, so the hypothesis that LRFs represent failed breeding dispersal attempts to find mates remains our most plausible explanation at this time. We conclude that inference about the mechanisms underlying animal movements should be confronted with complementary data, and suggest that mixed behavioral modes likely explain commonly observed fat-tailed movement distributions.