English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Meeting Abstract

Impaired perception of object orientation

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons83839

Bülthoff,  HH
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Karnath, H.-O., Ferber, S., & Bülthoff, H. (2000). Impaired perception of object orientation. In H. Bülthoff, M. Fahle, K. Gegenfurtner, & H. Mallot (Eds.), TWK 2000: Beiträge zur 3. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz (pp. 26). Kirchentellinsfurt, Germany: Knirsch.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-BE39-6
Abstract
The dissociation between object identity and object orientation recently observed in five
patients with brain damage, has been taken as evidence for a view-invariant model of
object recognition. However, there was also some indication that these patients were not
agnostic for object orientation but were able to gain access to at least some information
about objects' canonical upright. We studied a new case with spared knowledge of object
identity and impaired perception of object orientation using a forced choice paradigm to contrast directly the patient's ability to perceive objects' canonical upright vs. non-upright orientations. We presented 2D-pictures of objects with unambiguous canonical upright orientations in four different orientations (0°, -90°, +90°, 180°). KB showed no impairment
in identifying letters, objects, animals, or faces irrespective of their given orientation.
Also, her knowledge of upright orientation of stimuli was perfectly preserved. In
sharp contrast, KB was not able to judge the orientation when the stimuli were presented
in a non-upright orientation. The findings give further support for a distributed viewbased representation of objects in which neurons become tuned to the features present in certain views of an object. Since we see more upright than inverted animals and familiar
objects, the statistics of these images leads to a larger number of neurons tuned for
objects in an upright orientation. We suppose that for this reason KB’s knowledge of
upright orientation was found to be more robust against neuronal damage than knowledge of other orientations.