English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Precise radial velocities of giant stars. XII. Evidence against the proposed planet Aldebaran b

MPS-Authors

Reichert,  Katja
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Reffert,  Sabine
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Stock,  Stephan
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Trifonov,  Trifon
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Quirrenbach,  Andreas
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Reichert, K., Reffert, S., Stock, S., Trifonov, T., & Quirrenbach, A. (2019). Precise radial velocities of giant stars. XII. Evidence against the proposed planet Aldebaran b. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 625.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D282-A
Abstract
Context. Radial-velocity variations of the K giant star Aldebaran (α Tau) were first reported in the early 1990s. After subsequent analyses, the radial-velocity variability with a period of ̃629 d has recently been interpreted as caused by a planet of several Jovian masses.
Aims: We want to further investigate the hypothesis of an extrasolar planet around Aldebaran.
Methods: We combine 165 new radial- velocity measurements from Lick Observatory with seven already published data sets comprising 373 radial-velocity measurements. We perform statistical analyses and investigate whether a Keplerian model properly fits the radial velocities. We also perform a dynamical stability analysis for a possible two-planet solution. Furthermore, the possibility of oscillatory convective modes as cause for the observed radial-velocity variability is discussed.
Results: As best Keplerian fit to the combined radial-velocity data we obtain an orbit for the hypothetical planet with a smaller period (P = 607 d) and a larger eccentricity (e = 0.33 ± 0.04) than the previously proposed one. However, the residual scatter around that fit is still large, with a standard deviation of 117 ms-1. In 2006/2007, the statistical power of the ̃620 d period showed a temporary but significant decrease. Plotting the growth of power in reverse chronological order reveals that a period around 620 d is clearly present in the newest data but not in the data taken before ̃2006. Furthermore, an apparent phase shift between radial-velocity data and orbital solution is observable at certain times. A two-planet Keplerian fit matches the data considerably better than a single-planet solution, but poses severe dynamical stability issues.
Conclusions: The radial-velocity data from Lick Observatory do not further support but in fact weaken the hypothesis of a substellar companion around Aldebaran. Oscillatory convective modes might be a plausible alternative explanation of the observed radial- velocity variations. Based on observations collected at Lick Observatory, University of California.