English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Towards reliable uncertainties in IR interferometry: the bootstrap for correlated statistical and systematic errors

MPS-Authors

Lachaume,  Régis
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Rabus,  Markus
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Jordán,  Andrés
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Brahm,  Rafael
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Boyajian,  Tabetha
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

von Braun,  Kaspar
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Berger,  Jean-Philippe
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Max Planck Society and Cooperation Partners;

Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lachaume, R., Rabus, M., Jordán, A., Brahm, R., Boyajian, T., von Braun, K., et al. (2019). Towards reliable uncertainties in IR interferometry: the bootstrap for correlated statistical and systematic errors. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 484, 2656-2673.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D33D-9
Abstract
We propose a method to overcome the usual limitation of current data processing techniques in optical and infrared long-baseline interferometry: most reduction pipelines assume uncorrelated statistical errors and ignore systematics. We use the bootstrap method to sample the multivariate probability density function of the interferometric observables. It allows us to determine the correlations between statistical error terms and their deviation from a Gaussian distribution. In addition, we introduce systematics as an additional, highly correlated error term whose magnitude is chosen to fit the data dispersion. We have applied the method to obtain accurate measurements of stellar diameters for underresolved stars, i.e. smaller than the angular resolution of the interferometer. We show that taking correlations and systematics has a significant impact on both the diameter estimate and its uncertainty. The robustness of our diameter determination comes at a price: we obtain 4 times larger uncertainties, of a few per cent for most stars in our sample.