English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Tracking of small objects in front of a textured background by insects and vertebrates: phenomena and neuronal basis

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons84015

Kirschfeld,  K
Former Department Comparative Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kirschfeld, K. (1994). Tracking of small objects in front of a textured background by insects and vertebrates: phenomena and neuronal basis. Biological Cybernetics, 70(5), 407-415. doi:10.1007/BF00203233.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-FD3F-9
Abstract
To follow visually a small object moving in front of a textured background, insects and vertebrates can employ a similar strategy: saccadic tracking. In the case of vertebrates, the neural components that generate this behavior are not known in detail. The neural substrate of optomotor behavior in Diptera is relatively well understood. Here a model developed from the dipteran data is found to be capable of saccadic tracking. It is characterized by the following components and functions: (1) Two subsystems contribute to the response, a small-field tracking system and a large-field compensatory optomotor system, as suggested previously (Egelhaaf et al. 1988). (2) Both systems need to be suppressed during saccadic rotation. In the small-field system, the suppression, close to the visual input, is mediated by the activity of the large-field system. In the large-field system, suppression, close to the motor output, is due to efferent signals from the saccade generator. A similar model could also apply to vertebrates. Two implications of the present model are that saccadic tracking does not require object identification, and under saccadic tracking it is the background rather than the object that is stabilized on the retina. If objects are identified under these conditions, this must occur even though their image is not stabilized on the retina.