English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Intracellular responses from cells of the medulla of the fly, Calliphora erythrocephala

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons247032

DeVoe,  RD
Former Department Comparative Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons247036

Ockleford,  EM
Former Department Comparative Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

DeVoe, R., & Ockleford, E. (1976). Intracellular responses from cells of the medulla of the fly, Calliphora erythrocephala. Biological Cybernetics, 23(1), 13-24. doi:10.1007/BF00344147.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-3B2A-A
Abstract
1. Intracellular recordings were made from cells in medullae of immobilized, intact flies Calliphora erythrocephala. Stimuli were moving gratings or small spots projected onto translucent hemispheres before the fly.—2. Responses to stationary flashes included tonic and phasic slow potentials only. Sustaining and On/Off discharges were recorded from cells silent in the dark. Sustaining, dimming, On/Off, +On-Off, and-On/-Off discharges were recorded from cells spontaneous in the dark (Fig. 1, 2, and 3).—3. Some cells were relatively sensitive to 3 log unit changes in flash intensities; others were insensitive (Fig. 4).—4. Receptive fields of a few cells tested were small-field ipsilateral monocular, large-field ipsilateral monocular, or large-field binocular.—5. A number of types of nondirectional cells were found. Some gave stronger discharges to movement than to stationary flashes (Fig. 5).—6. Directionally-selective cells were generally spontaneous. Some simply fired faster in the preferred direction. Others (Fig. 6) had inhibition in the null diriction with or without hyperpolarizations.—7. Possibly-new nondirectional cells were found that were inhibited by changes of direction of movement (Fig. 7)—8. A number of cells were stained with Procion yellow, using high voltage pulses. Double stainings sometimes occurred (Fig. 8).